2025–26 Departmental Results Report - Supplementary Information Tables

(Back to the 2025–26 Departmental Results Report.)



Details on Transfer Payment Programs

Transfer payment program or funding agreementProvision of legal advisory services under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (PSDPA)

Timeframe of the Transfer Payment Program

Start date2010–11
End dateOngoing
Fiscal year for terms and conditions2010–11

Funding Details

Listing in the Public AccountsContributions for access to legal advice under the PSDPA
Name of program terms and conditionsTerms and Conditions for the Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada’s Contribution Program
Type of transfer paymentContribution
Type of appropriationThe program is appropriated annually through the Estimates.

Purpose and Objectives

Purpose and objectives of transfer payment programThe program is made pursuant to section 25.1 of the PSDPA and supports the Core Responsibility of the Office. It provides access to legal advice in a timely and effective matter to qualified individuals about their rights and obligations under the PSDPA.
Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2025–26Recipients retain their own lawyers and the latter establish a contractual relationship with the Office. A dedicated email address is offered to lawyers and recipients to write to the Office for any inquiries about the program and in regard to the payment of their invoices.

Departmental Results Framework

Link to departmental result(s)Public sector disclosures of wrongdoing and complaints of reprisal are dealt with in a timely and effective manner.
Link to the department’s program inventoryDisclosure and Reprisal Management Program
Results achievedThe transfer payment program provided qualified individuals with access to legal advice about their situation, rights, obligations and assistance in determining their best course of action. In 2024–25, the Office received 81 requests for funding for legal advice under the PSDPA and 28 of those requests were granted.

Evaluations and Audits

Findings of audits completed in 2025–26There were no audits completed during the 2025–26 reporting year.
Findings of evaluations completed in 2025–26

There were no evaluations completed during the 2025–26 reporting year.

The last evaluation of the transfer payment program was completed in 2018–19. Since then, this program was not identified as requiring an audit or evaluation based on this Office’s Risk-Based Audit and Evaluation Plan.

Financial Information

Type of transfer payment

2023–24 actual spending

2024–25 actual spending

2025–26 planned spending

2025–26 total authorities available for use

2025–26 actual spending (authorities used)

Variance (2025–26 actual minus 2025–26 planned)

Total grants

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Total contributions

$21,574

$27,302

$50,000

$50,000

$23,077

$26,923

Total other transfer payments

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Total program

$21,574

$27,302

$50,000

$50,000

$23,077

$26,923

Explanation of Variances

In 2025–26, actual expenditures totalled $23,077, approximately 54% below planned spending of $50,000.

Planned spending and actual spending vary significantly due to the functioning of the program. Although the Commissioner approves funding up to $3,000 over the course of a FY, the Office has no control over when recipients retain their lawyers and recipients often use their funding over the span of more than one fiscal year.

Plan to Address Variance

The Office continues to examine different delivery models for the program and to implement reasonable periods for recipients to use their funding.

Gender-based Analysis Plus

Section 1: Institutional GBA Plus Governance and Capacity

Governance

The mandate of the Office does not have specific goals, processes or outcomes related to gender identity or other diversity characteristics.

Due to the confidential nature of disclosures and complaints, demographic data about disclosers and complainants is not collected.

The Office takes disclosures of wrongdoing from any person and continues to accept disclosures and complaints in many formats to support individuals who may require accommodation for a disability (for example, taking a disclosure over the phone, instead of in writing).

Capacity

The mandate of the Office does not have specific goals, processes or outcomes related to gender identity or other diversity characteristics.

Due to the confidential nature of disclosures and complaints, demographic data about disclosers and complainants is not collected.

The Office takes disclosures of wrongdoing from any person and continues to accept disclosures and complaints in many formats to support individuals who may require accommodation for a disability (for example, taking a disclosure over the phone, instead of in writing).

Human Resources (Full-Time Equivalents) Dedicated to GBA Plus

The Office does not have a dedicated full-time equivalent for GBA Plus and its implementation. A member of the management team plays the role of GBA Plus Champion for the organization and ensures proposals for funding and interactions with stakeholders do not negatively impact any specific groups.

Section 2: Gender and Diversity Impacts, by Program

Core responsibilityIn order to meet its legislated mandate, the Office must maintain an adequate external whistleblowing regime for the federal public sector.
Program namePublic sector disclosures of wrongdoing and complaints of reprisal
Program goals

The goal of the program is to handle disclosures of wrongdoing and complaints of reprisal in a timely manner.

The mandate of the Office does not have specific goals, processes or outcomes related to gender identity or other diversity characteristics.

Due to the confidential nature of disclosures and complaints, demographic data about disclosers and complainants is not collected.

The Office takes disclosures of wrongdoing from any person and continues to accept disclosures and complaints in many formats to support individuals who may require accommodation for a disability (for example, taking a disclosure over the phone, instead of in writing).

It is predicted that this proposal will not benefit specific group of individuals.

Target populationAny individual can make a disclosure of wrongdoing to the Office, and any public servant or former public servant can make a complaint of reprisal. The program serves the public interest, by shedding light on serious wrongdoing.
Specific demographic group(s) to be monitoredNo specific group has been targeted. Confidentiality provisions in our enabling legislation make collection of demographic data impossible.
Key program impacts* on gender and diversityNot available
GBA Plus data collection planNot available

Scales

Gender scale
  • First group: predominantly men (80% or more men)
  • Second group: 60% to 79% men
  • Third group: broadly gender-balanced
  • Fourth group: 60% to 79% women
  • Fifth group: predominantly women (80% or more women)
Income-level scale
  • First group: strongly benefits low-income individuals (strongly progressive)
  • Second group: somewhat benefits low-income individuals (somewhat progressive)
  • Third group: no significant distributional impacts
  • Fourth group: somewhat benefits high-income individuals (somewhat regressive)
  • Fifth group: strongly benefits high-income individuals (strongly regressive)
Age-group scale
  • First group: primarily benefits youth, children or future generations
  • Second group: no significant intergenerational impacts or impacts on generations
    between youths and seniors
  • Third group: primarily benefits seniors or the baby boomer generation.

Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits

Response to audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official LanguagesThere were no external audits in 2025–26 requiring a response.